First off, I think I should make it clear that this is a loosely defined group of theories at best. There's no justifiable way to ever be able to call these ideas facts, or Laws of Social Dynamics (as there are Laws of Nature or Physics,) because by definition, a law is something that has been proven to be true and accurate 100% of the time. There will never be anything, no matter how broad, basic or universal, that will apply to human psychology all the time without fail. The nature of human individuality defies the idea that something as rigid as a law could be inflicted upon it with any accuracy. Most things that seem close are in fact aspects of physiology, hardwired into the actual physical object of the brain, not part of the intangible mass of indefinables that form the heart of psychology. The brain indeed controls everything, but that does not mean everything it controls is part of the mentalic sciences.
These theories are presented in no particular order, because in truth, they're still too fuzzy for me to impose some sort of form on their organization. There are also many more that I've not yet noticed or thought about and attempted to analyze floating about in the nebulous haze of the human psyche. Bear with me, I'm one man, and I can only take things as I see them, and it takes me time to filter out as much of my own subjective influences as is possible. I do indeed strive to present these things and look at them from an unbiased standpoint, but as a human, this is nearly impossible to truly filter my opinions out with any certainty. What can I say? I do the best I can.
So, without further adieu, here it is as it stands now, my Fundamentals of Humanics.
These theories are presented in no particular order, because in truth, they're still too fuzzy for me to impose some sort of form on their organization. There are also many more that I've not yet noticed or thought about and attempted to analyze floating about in the nebulous haze of the human psyche. Bear with me, I'm one man, and I can only take things as I see them, and it takes me time to filter out as much of my own subjective influences as is possible. I do indeed strive to present these things and look at them from an unbiased standpoint, but as a human, this is nearly impossible to truly filter my opinions out with any certainty. What can I say? I do the best I can.
So, without further adieu, here it is as it stands now, my Fundamentals of Humanics.




